Giver, Taker, Matcher: Decoding Your Team Dynamics
2
11
0
Success in Startups & Companies is less about individual brilliance and more about collective strength. Drawing on the research pioneered by Adam Grant, we can categorise team members as Givers, Takers, and Matchers. Each type brings distinct strengths and challenges that can either spur success or sow discord. Recognising these dynamics lets you manage conflict, harness strengths, and ultimately create a balanced, thriving team culture.
Introduction: What Are Givers, Takers, and Matchers?
Givers are the heart of any cooperative team. They freely offer help, share knowledge, and prioritise collective success over self-interest.
Takers focus on what they can extract from every situation, often at the risk of undermining team cohesion through self-serving behaviours.
Matchers act as the equilibrium, reciprocating support and ensuring fairness across interactions.
Understanding these roles is essential for two key reasons:
Conflict Prevention & Resolution: Recognising these personality types early on helps you prevent conflicts that commonly arise from mismatched expectations.
Optimised Team Performance: When you know who your givers, takers, and matchers are, you can tailor your leadership and projects' resource allocation to maximise everyone’s potential while maintaining balance.
A simple matrix to help identify and classify these roles:
Personality | Core Characteristics | Key Behaviours in Teams | Impact on Dynamics |
Giver | Altruistic, collaborative | Offers help without keeping score | Boosts morale, fosters trust |
Taker | Self-interested, competitive | Seeks personal gain, sometimes at the team’s expense | Can cause friction, frustration and imbalance |
Matcher | Fair, balanced | Rewards quid pro quo, keeps score | Maintains equilibrium, ensures fairness |
Part 1: Navigating Conflicts Among These Mentality Types
Conflict can prick the fabric of teamwork if left unchecked. Let’s explore some of the common issues and ways to defuse them.
Typical Conflicts
Giver vs. Taker: A classic issue is when a giver’s selfless act is exploited by a taker who later claims undue credit.
Example: Imagine Sarah, a giver, who goes out of her way to support John's project. John, a taker, then leverages Sarah’s work to advance his own career without acknowledgement.
Matcher in the Middle: Matchers often find themselves frustrated when the balance of contributions skews too far. They may feel compelled to constantly correct imbalances, which can further exacerbate tensions.
Conflict Resolution Strategies
Understanding these friction points allows you to implement targeted conflict resolution measures.
Consider the following matrix for guidance:
Scenario | Unacceptable Behaviours | Resolution Strategy | Possible Consequences if Unchecked |
Giver exploited by Taker | Credit theft, disregard for team input | Action: Establish clear guidelines around attribution and accountability; hold regular feedback sessions. | Erosion of trust and demotivation leading to burnout |
Matcher overwhelmed by imbalance | Reluctance to contribute beyond fair exchange | Action: Introduce mediation sessions, reiterate team values, and encourage transparent communication. | Diminished team morale and a rise in internal conflicts |
Setting the right expectations, backed by a firm policy on accountability and ensures that any breach of team ethics is met with appropriate consequences, such as performance reviews, reassignment of responsibilities, or in severe cases, corrective measures up to dismissal.
Part 2: Managing and Driving Each Personality
A Team is like an orchestra. Each instrument plays its part, but only when properly managed in harmony will they create a symphony. Below are tailored strategies to effectively lead givers, takers, and matchers.
For the Givers
Leverage Their Strengths: Recognise and reward collaboration. Ensure their efforts are visible and celebrated.
Guard Against Burnout: Introduce balanced workloads and explicitly define boundaries.
For the Takers
Channel their Ambition: Align their drive with the team’s goals by setting transparent, performance-based rewards.
Enforce Accountability: Regular check-ins and clear credit attribution help curb self-serving behaviour.
For the Matchers
Empower their Fairness Approach: Use matchers as mediators who can help maintain team balance. Provide them with tools to objectively assess contributions.
Avoid Overburdening: Ensure they are not saddled with too many “fairness” responsibilities which might stifle their own creative input.
The following matrix sums up the management strategies:
Personality | Management Strategies | Key Incentives | Pitfalls to Avoid |
Giver | Recognition, mentorship, balanced workload, and role clarity | Intrinsic rewards, team reputation | Risk of burnout if overextended |
Taker | Clear performance metrics, transparent rewards, accountability | Bonuses, personal growth opportunities | Unchecked ambition can lead to exploitative practices |
Matcher | Empower mediation, structured feedback processes, role clarity | Career progression, trust-building | Overreliance on ensuring reciprocity may limit innovation |
Part 3: Achieving a Balanced Team
A truly balanced team recognises the unique contributions of every personality type. The goal is to harness each type’s strengths to create a synergistic force that drives the organisation forward.
Ideal Team Composition
While there isn’t a one-size-fits-all formula, many successful teams might aim for an approximate distribution such as:
Personality | Rationale | Suggested Proportion |
Giver | Their supportive nature fosters a collaborative environment, crucial for creative problem-solving. | 30–40% |
Matcher | Their emphasis on fairness stabilises the team’s emotional and operational dynamics. | 40–50% |
Taker | Controlled ambition can drive breakthroughs but must be kept in check to avoid toxicity. | 10–20% |
Striking the Balance
A balanced team means not just knowing the percentages on paper but constantly nurturing an environment where:
Givers are shielded from being taken advantage of;
Takers are held accountable for equitable behaviour;
Matchers serve as the glue to ensure everyone collaborates effectively.
Regularly reviewing team composition and dynamics through feedback sessions or even informal check-ins helps ensure that the balance is maintained as the startup evolves.
Part 4: Spotting Behaviours During Interviews
Identifying these traits during the recruitment process is essential. To build your dream team, your interview process should dig deep into candidate behaviour. Here are some tips and sample questions:
Interview Questions Matrix
Personality | Interview Question | What to Listen For |
Giver | “Can you tell me about a time you helped a colleague succeed, even if it wasn’t part of your role?” | Emphasis on collaboration, willingness to support, and outcome focused on team success. |
Taker | “Describe a project where you took the lead. What motivated you, and how did you ensure your contribution was recognised?” | Focus on personal achievement, ambition, and how they claim credit. |
Matcher | “How do you approach working on team projects to ensure everyone’s contributions are balanced?” | Look for an appreciation of fairness, examples of mediating conflicts, and balance. |
Tips for Interviewers
Behavioural Scenarios: Beyond questions, provide role-playing scenarios where candidates must make decisions that reveal their natural inclinations.
Cross-References: Ask follow-up questions that explore how candidates handle situations when their ethics are tested.
Collaborative Exercises: Consider team interviews or group problem-solving sessions to observe interaction dynamics firsthand.
Conclusion
Understanding the Giver, Taker, Matcher dynamics isn’t just an academic exercise—it’s a practical, actionable strategy for building a resilient startup team. By identifying these personality types early, you can prevent conflicts, manage each talent in a way that leverages their natural strengths, and strike the perfect balance in your team.
In summary:
Recognising and classifying these types leads to improved accountability and a healthier team culture.
Conflict mitigation strategies ensure that the selfless aren’t exploited and the competitive spirit is channelled positively.
Tailored management approaches for each type catalyse individual and team growth.
Thoughtful interviewing techniques enable you to spot potential red flags before they become disruptive.
A startup fueled by a balanced blend of givers, takers (in their positive form), and matchers can foster innovation, trust, and longevity. Leaders who invest in understanding these personalities not only create a harmonious workplace but also pave the way for sustained growth and competitive advantage.
Run regular team reviews and personality assessments as your startup scales. These sessions can reveal shifts in dynamics over time and help you recalibrate your management and hiring strategies. Moreover, nurturing an environment where every voice is heard (whether it’s a giver’s selfless support, a matcher’s sense of fairness, or even a taker’s drive) ensures that every facet of your team contributes to underlying success.
